D'Onta Foreman's rushing yards props show perfect market efficiency with a 50.0% over rate (7-7-0) across 14 games. His 36.57 yard average barely exceeds the 35.93 line by just 0.6 yards, creating a neutral betting environment. With negative ROI on both sides (-4.5%), this prop offers no discernible edge.
Expert Analysis
The D'Onta Foreman rushing yards market represents textbook efficient pricing, where sportsbooks have dialed in his usage patterns with surgical precision. His role as Cleveland's backup running back creates inherent volatility - some games offer expanded opportunities due to game script or injury, while others limit him to special packages and garbage time touches. The razor-thin 0.6 yard differential between his actual production and betting lines suggests oddsmakers have accounted for this inconsistency perfectly. Foreman's production heavily depends on game flow and Cleveland's offensive approach, factors that vary dramatically week to week. The equal distribution of overs and unders, combined with negative ROI on both sides, indicates the juice is eating into any potential edge. Without clear split data showing performance in specific situations, bettors are essentially flipping a coin against market vigorish. The current one-game under streak means nothing in this sample size, and his longest streaks of just 2-3 games show no sustainable momentum patterns. This prop exemplifies why backup running backs often represent the sharpest markets - their usage is predictable enough for accurate line-setting but unpredictable enough to frustrate bettors seeking edges.
Betting Verdict
PASS with HIGH confidence. This D'Onta Foreman rushing yards prop offers zero edge with perfect 50% over rate and negative ROI on both sides. The 0.6 yard average differential is meaningless noise, not signal. Smart money avoids coin flips with vigorish attached. Wait for injury news or specific game script advantages before considering action on Foreman props.
Performance vs Line
Game Log (Last 14 Games)
| Date | Opp | Line | Actual | +/- | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | OPP | 28.5 | 5.0 | -23.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-10-13 | OPP | 22.5 | 31.0 | +8.5 | OVER |
| 2024-10-06 | OPP | 20.5 | 44.0 | +23.5 | OVER |
| 2024-09-29 | OPP | 31.5 | 2.0 | -29.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-09-22 | OPP | 44.5 | 5.0 | -39.5 | UNDER |
| 2023-12-17 | OPP | 42.5 | -6.0 | -48.5 | UNDER |
| 2023-12-10 | OPP | 30.5 | 50.0 | +19.5 | OVER |
| 2023-11-19 | OPP | 33.5 | 14.0 | -19.5 | UNDER |
| 2023-11-09 | OPP | 28.5 | 80.0 | +51.5 | OVER |
| 2023-11-05 | OPP | 39.5 | 83.0 | +43.5 | OVER |
| 2023-10-29 | OPP | 47.5 | 34.0 | -13.5 | UNDER |
| 2023-10-22 | OPP | 62.5 | 89.0 | +26.5 | OVER |
| 2023-10-15 | OPP | 50.5 | 65.0 | +14.5 | OVER |
| 2023-09-10 | OPP | 20.5 | 16.0 | -4.5 | UNDER |
Key Splits
Home vs Away
Favorite vs Underdog
Recent Trend
Find the Best Rushing Yards Prop Lines
Compare D'Onta Foreman props across top sportsbooks.
Compare SportsbooksFrequently Asked Questions
What is D'Onta Foreman's Rushing Yards prop record all games?
D'Onta Foreman has gone over his rushing yards prop in exactly 7 of 14 games (50.0%) with 7 overs, 7 unders, and 0 pushes. His average of 36.57 yards barely exceeds the typical 35.93 line, showing perfect market balance.
Should I bet OVER or UNDER on D'Onta Foreman Rushing Yards all games?
Pass on D'Onta Foreman rushing yards props entirely. The 50% over rate with negative ROI on both sides offers no edge. This is a coin flip with juice attached - exactly what sharp bettors avoid in efficient backup RB markets.
What's D'Onta Foreman's average Rushing Yards all games?
D'Onta Foreman averages 36.57 rushing yards compared to a typical line of 35.93 yards. This minuscule 0.6 yard difference represents market noise, not a meaningful edge, explaining the perfectly balanced 7-7-0 over/under record across 14 games.
How reliable is this trend?
Never bet D'Onta Foreman rushing yards props under current conditions. The only potential opportunity would be injury news to Cleveland's primary backs or extreme weather/game script situations not reflected in this perfectly efficient historical data.