Fade UNDER
2-8 O/U Record
20.0% Over Rate
-6.2u Units Won
-61.8% ROI
Find Best Line

Pascal Siakam's blocks production has cratered over his last 10 games, hitting the over just twice for a brutal 20% success rate while averaging 0.3 blocks against a 0.5 line. This -0.2 differential represents a significant defensive regression that creates compelling under value.

Expert Analysis

Siakam's blocks collapse from his career averages reveals a fundamental shift in his defensive positioning since joining Indiana. The 0.3 blocks per game represents his lowest sustained period in years, suggesting either a strategic change in his help defense responsibilities or a conscious effort to avoid foul trouble in his new system. The Pacers' uptempo style may be pulling Siakam away from traditional rim protection duties, as they prioritize transition opportunities over half-court defensive rotations. His 2-8-0 record isn't just bad luck—it reflects a player whose defensive role has genuinely evolved. The longest under streak of three games and current two-game under run indicate this isn't random variance but a persistent trend. Siakam's historical shot-blocking was never elite, typically hovering around 0.6-0.8 per game, making this current 0.3 average a meaningful departure. The -61.8% ROI on overs tells the complete story: books haven't fully adjusted to his diminished blocks production in Indiana's system. Without significant changes to his defensive assignments or a return to more traditional big man duties, this under trend has strong analytical backing for continued success.

Betting Verdict

LEAN UNDER with MEDIUM confidence. Siakam's blocks production has fundamentally shifted in Indiana's system, creating a persistent edge against inflated lines. The 0.3 average against 0.5 lines offers consistent value, especially when books haven't fully adjusted to his new defensive role. Primary risk involves potential lineup changes that could restore his help defense responsibilities, but current trends strongly favor the under.

2 OVERS (20.0%)
8 UNDERS
0% 50% breakeven 100%

Performance vs Line

Game Log (Last 10 Games)

Date Opp Line Actual +/- Result
2024-04-14 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-04-12 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-04-09 OPP 0.5 2.0 +1.5 OVER
2024-04-05 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-04-03 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-04-01 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-03-29 OPP 0.5 1.0 +0.5 OVER
2024-03-27 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-03-25 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER
2024-03-22 OPP 0.5 0.0 -0.5 UNDER

Key Splits

Home vs Away

Home 25.0% Over
Away 16.7% Over

Favorite vs Underdog

Favorite 50.0% Over
Underdog 50.0% Over

Recent Trend

Last 5 20.0% Over
Last 10 20.0% Over

Find the Best Blocks Prop Lines

Compare Pascal Siakam props across top sportsbooks.

Compare Sportsbooks

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Pascal Siakam's Blocks prop record last 10 games?

Pascal Siakam has gone 2-8-0 on blocks overs in his last 10 games, hitting just 20% of over bets. He's averaging 0.3 blocks per game against typical 0.5 lines, creating a -0.2 differential that heavily favors under bets.

Should I bet OVER or UNDER on Pascal Siakam Blocks last 10 games?

Bet under on Siakam's blocks props. His 20% over rate and 0.3 average against 0.5 lines create strong under value. The trend reflects his reduced rim protection role in Indiana's system, not temporary variance.

What's Pascal Siakam's average Blocks last 10 games?

Siakam is averaging 0.3 blocks over his last 10 games, significantly below the standard 0.5 line. This -0.2 differential represents his lowest sustained blocks production in years and indicates a fundamental shift in his defensive responsibilities.

How reliable is this trend?

Target Siakam blocks unders when he faces teams that don't heavily attack the rim or in pace-up spots where Indiana prioritizes transition defense. His reduced help defense role makes unders most valuable against perimeter-oriented offenses.

Methodology: This analysis covers 10 games from 2024-03-22 to 2024-04-14. O/U results use closing prop lines. ROI assumes -110 juice. Pushes excluded from percentages.