CJ Abrams presents a compelling under opportunity with his total bases props hitting just 38.5% of the time across 104 games. His 1.7 average falls significantly short of the typical 2.11 line, creating consistent value on the under with a strong +17.5% ROI.
Expert Analysis
The numbers paint a clear picture of why CJ Abrams total bases unders have been profitable. His 1.7 average represents a substantial 0.4-base deficit against the standard 2.11 line, indicating books consistently overvalue his offensive output. This isn't a small sample anomaly—104 games provide robust evidence of a systematic mispricing. The 38.5% over rate suggests Abrams lacks the consistent extra-base power that drives total bases props over. His profile as a contact-oriented shortstop aligns with this data, as speed-first players often struggle to consistently reach the multi-base thresholds required for overs. The -26.6% ROI on overs versus +17.5% on unders creates a massive 44.1% gap, one of the largest edges we track. Current streak data showing 2 consecutive unders fits the broader pattern, though his longest under streak reached 7 games, indicating the potential for extended cold stretches. The absence of meaningful splits data actually strengthens the case—when a trend holds across all conditions without significant variation, it suggests a fundamental skill-based edge rather than situational variance. Books appear slow to adjust their lines despite overwhelming evidence of Abrams' limitations in accumulating total bases.
Betting Verdict
UNDER with HIGH confidence. The 44.1% ROI gap between overs and unders represents exceptional value, backed by 104 games of consistent evidence. CJ Abrams total bases props are systematically overpriced, making unders a core play regardless of matchup specifics. The primary risk is positive regression, but his contact-heavy profile suggests this edge should persist throughout the season.
Performance vs Line
Game Log (Last 15 Games)
| Date | Opp | Line | Actual | +/- | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-16 | OPP | 4.5 | 0.0 | -4.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-08-08 | OPP | 3.5 | 0.0 | -3.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-08-06 | OPP | 1.5 | 5.0 | +3.5 | OVER |
| 2024-07-29 | OPP | 1.5 | 2.0 | +0.5 | OVER |
| 2024-07-27 | OPP | 2.5 | 1.0 | -1.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-07-26 | OPP | 2.5 | 1.0 | -1.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-07-25 | OPP | 1.5 | 0.0 | -1.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-07-23 | OPP | 4.5 | 0.0 | -4.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-07-21 | OPP | 4.5 | 1.0 | -3.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-07-19 | OPP | 2.5 | 0.0 | -2.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-07-14 | OPP | 4.5 | 3.0 | -1.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-07-13 | OPP | 3.5 | 4.0 | +0.5 | OVER |
| 2024-07-12 | OPP | 3.5 | 1.0 | -2.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-07-10 | OPP | 1.5 | 0.0 | -1.5 | UNDER |
| 2024-07-09 | OPP | 4.5 | 0.0 | -4.5 | UNDER |
Key Splits
Home vs Away
Favorite vs Underdog
Recent Trend
Find the Best Total Bases Prop Lines
Compare CJ Abrams props across top sportsbooks.
Compare SportsbooksFrequently Asked Questions
What is CJ Abrams's Total Bases prop record all games?
CJ Abrams has gone over his total bases prop in just 40 of 104 games (38.5%) from May 2023 through August 2024. This 40-64 record represents significant underperformance against bookmaker expectations and creates consistent value on under bets.
Should I bet OVER or UNDER on CJ Abrams Total Bases all games?
Bet the under on CJ Abrams total bases props with high confidence. His 38.5% over rate and +17.5% under ROI across 104 games provide compelling evidence of systematic overpricing by sportsbooks on his offensive output.
What's CJ Abrams's average Total Bases all games?
CJ Abrams averages 1.7 total bases per game against a typical line of 2.11, creating a 0.4-base deficit. This substantial gap between his actual production and bookmaker expectations drives the consistent profitability of under bets.
How reliable is this trend?
Bet CJ Abrams total bases unders consistently regardless of matchup specifics. The 104-game sample shows no meaningful situational splits, indicating this edge persists across all conditions rather than being dependent on specific scenarios or opponents.