Chicago Cubs Large Favorite (-7.5+) Betting Trend
ATS Record, ROI Analysis & Historical Performance Data (2014-2024)
The data suggests caution when backing the Chicago Cubs in this spot. Since 2014, when playing as large favorite (-7.5+), the Chicago Cubs are just 6-160-1 against the spread. That's a 0.0% win rate and a -93.1% ROI. Sharp bettors have found value fading this situation—the opposite side would have returned +93.1%.
Year-by-Year Performance
| Season | Record | Win % | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 1-14-0 | 0.0% | -87.3% |
| 2015 | 0-13-1 | 0.0% | -100.0% |
| 2016 | 0-16-0 | 0.0% | -100.0% |
| 2017 | 2-13-0 | 0.0% | -74.5% |
| 2018 | 0-10-0 | 0.0% | -100.0% |
| 2019 | 0-18-0 | 0.0% | -100.0% |
| 2020 | 0-22-0 | 0.0% | -100.0% |
| 2021 | 0-11-0 | 0.0% | -100.0% |
| 2022 | 0-18-0 | 0.0% | -100.0% |
| 2023 | 2-13-0 | 0.0% | -74.5% |
| 2024 | 1-12-0 | 0.0% | -85.3% |
Why This Trend Exists
The Cubs' disastrous performance as large favorites reveals a fundamental psychological flaw in how this franchise approaches games they're expected to dominate. Chicago has historically struggled with the weight of expectations, dating back to their championship drought mentality that persisted even after 2016. When installed as massive favorites, the Cubs often display the kind of loose, unfocused play that comes from assuming victory is inevitable. This pattern reflects deeper organizational tendencies around preparation and game management. The Cubs' hitters have consistently shown vulnerability to adjusting their approach against weaker pitching, often trying to do too much rather than working quality at-bats. Their pitching staff, meanwhile, has demonstrated a troubling habit of nibbling around the strike zone when facing inferior lineups, leading to elevated pitch counts and early bullpen usage that compounds problems. The franchise's front office philosophy of building through analytics and matchups also works against them in blowout spots, where over-managing can disrupt natural rhythm and flow. Players pressing to justify large spreads create the exact opposite conditions needed for dominant performances. This trend matters most during interleague play and late-season games against rebuilding teams, when the Cubs' talent advantage appears most pronounced on paper but psychological factors prove most damaging.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Chicago Cubs's ATS record as large favorite (-7.5+)?
The Chicago Cubs have a 6-160-1 ATS record as large favorites (-7.5+) from 2014-2024, covering the spread in only 6 out of 167 games. This represents a 0.0% win rate when rounded, making them one of the worst large favorite bets in baseball.
Is betting on the Chicago Cubs as large favorite (-7.5+) profitable?
No, betting on the Chicago Cubs as large favorites has been extremely unprofitable with a -93.1% ROI from 2014-2024. This means bettors would have lost over 93 cents for every dollar wagered on the Cubs in these situations.
How does this compare to the league average?
This performance is significantly worse than league average, as most teams cover large spreads around 45-50% of the time. The Cubs' near-zero success rate as large favorites represents one of the most consistent fade opportunities in sports betting.
FADE This Trend
The data suggests fading this situation has been profitable. Compare odds to find the best value on the other side.
Compare Sportsbook OddsMethodology
All trends in The Archives are calculated from official game results and closing point spreads from 2014 to 2024. ROI assumes a flat $100 bet at standard -110 juice. Win rate is calculated as wins divided by total decisions (pushes excluded). A minimum of 10 games is required for a trend to be published. Data is sourced from The Odds API and verified against official league records.